UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

05.08.2022
citas-cornudo visitors

The latest Axioms: A quick Bottom line and you will Data each and every Publication

von Team

Therefore to possess a new direction:

  1. Books We–V: the eutopia portraying a suitable area additionally the education of the Guardians, parting regarding trying to explain fairness;
  2. Books VI–VII: define “philosopher”, given that philosophers will be better rulers of such a community;
  3. Instructions VIII–X: discuss the advantages and disadvantages of several standard different authorities.

The new key of one’s next area is talked about throughout the Allegory of the Cavern, and you can blogs regarding the concept out of (ideal) variations. The 3rd region questions the five regimes that’s strongly related to to help you Plato’s Guidelines conversation; in addition to Misconception off Er.”

Guide We towards “What exactly is Fairness?”

Book We, beginning having casual discussion, and you can creates the ebook which aims to resolve a few trick issues thru a discussion between Socrates and you will “friends”.

“What is justice?“, “why should we be just?“, and assuming we should be just, “why is justice the greatest good for the soul and the state?… How do we prove it empircally?” <-- the main theme of the book (the main questions the book seeks to answer).

Right here, the latest responses given try: step one. Cephalus says, “justice is giving what exactly is due” (a common well-intentioned disagreement), dos. Polemarchus states, “[justice is actually] the ways which provides good to family members and you will worst in order to opponents” (a familiar well-intentioned disagreement), and step 3. Thrasymachus says, “fairness is nothing more compared to the desire of one’s stronger” (a good Sophist disagreement one to claims people really should not be concerned about morals and you can integrity; only the form of “pseudo realist” conflict Plato and you will Aristotle invested its functions debating up against).

Socrates debunks the meanings, but never fully provides a response. That being said, the guy essentially eludes in order to a response he will bring so much more obviously after, which is,

“Justice is the excellence (arete) of the soul and state regarding the ends of spreading happiness and relieving unhappiness in the greatest number of people. It is achieved through moderation and balance of the virtues which must be cultivated in the soul and state via the proper culture, laws, and form of government”. <- me summarizing the answer to the main questions of the book (Plato never says this explicitly, especially not in Book I).

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben