UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

18.06.2022
sugar-daddies-usa+co+denver review

Nearly 50% away from participants had been slightly or completely satisfied with hard conversations with colleagues

von Team

3) Come waiting.

Fractl surveyed step one,100 professionals precisely how they sensed throughout the difficult talks about workplace, and so they unearthed that participants had been expected to be somewhat otherwise entirely satisfied by the opinions discussions which have a primary declaration than just which have an excellent. The newest encouraging results?

How will you make certain that viewpoints talks ranging from co-worker was productive and leave every parties found? Come to viewpoints meetings prepared. An astonishing 85% of your survey respondents said they available to hard talks inside the improve, in fact it is smart advice about one viewpoints meeting, no matter what relaxed.

When preparing to possess a remark ending up in a peer, have the following questions in your mind in order that the time is actually really-spent:

  1. Exactly what are your targets? What are both of you wanting to get from this fulfilling?
  2. How do you each other come together to get to her or him? How do you help your peer build and you may improve?

4) Find out the almost every other man or woman’s layout.

As you may already know just off previous career sense, opinions can sometimes wipe the wrong way. It would be the content of viewpoints, or you could become delivering grievance in person, it may be since you and your associate delivering viewpoints enjoys various other interaction styles.

Stec implies that fellow reviewers “take time to discover how anyone you happen to be handling prefers to receive views — and you will bundle their notes accordingly.”

Ye prompts assumption-function before giving feedback very colleagues know very well what can be expected away from you early. “I am a highly head individual and you can my opinions is similar method. I’m sure that my feedback can come off because the blunt otherwise abrupt, so i set the fresh new assumption early you to definitely that’s my personal design, therefore anybody finding feedback aren’t taken aback.”

The simplest way to understand your own colleague’s looks are to inquire about: Manage that they like for the-person conversations, or letters? Create they need large-image opinions, otherwise manage they want to plunge towards and work out alter? Believe inquiring colleagues in the identity assessments, for instance the Disk take to, that may give you higher understanding of the way you colleagues https://i.pinimg.com/236x/0e/c4/d0/0ec4d03b2f9cc43451313e2f7488ac97–puppies-glasses.jpg” alt=”sugar babies Denver CO”> display and you may work best.

5) Get to the point.

There is created ahead of concerning importance of maybe not providing opinions inside the form of a “sandwich,” whereby constructive feedback are preceded and you can accompanied by positive feedback in order to decrease the sting out-of criticism. It can commonly help make your co-workers getting patronized and you may condescended to help you, therefore miss out the sandwich.

As an alternative, is a review flatbread (bear with me right here, I am starving). In lieu of prefacing constructive problem having praise, diving toward viewpoints lead-into, and you will follow it up with sharing exactly how its importance will be always resolve the situation.

An additional research, Zenger/Folkman interviewed nearly 4,100000 teams that has obtained bad feedback inquiring them when they was indeed surprised of the ailment they had received, and you can 74% had currently understood and just weren’t shocked because of the viewpoints. When you’re preparing to meet with a peer from the means capable enhance their performs, it’s safe to imagine they know by themselves fairly well. Address aspects of increases and ways they may be able explore their importance to improve, as opposed to following the an accompany-critique-match sub recipe.

Ye cards that suit sub can “unknown the actual feedback and regularly cause even more series away from back-and-ahead,” but she echoes the need to interweave confident comments towards peer viewpoints discussions. “It’s discouraging never to get any positive viewpoints, and it’s an overlooked possible opportunity to call-out and strengthen good habits.”

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben