UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

21.06.2022
cupid-inceleme gözden geçirmek

Inside Desk dos i show new imply viewpoints out of battle/ethnic teams, men and women, and you can religious exposure groups into internalized homophobia

von Team

Religiosity and you will Internalized Homophobia

To check our hypotheses, we made use of average minimum squares several linear regression analyses in every times except that; whenever investigations next step your mediational hypothesis we utilized logistic regression because these outcomes (the new hypothesized mediators) were dichotomous. All the regression analyses managed to possess employment, online really worth, and you will degree.

Consistent with our very own hypothesis, professionals exactly who went to during the non-affirming religious settings got somewhat large internalized homophobia as opposed to those which attended when you look at the affirming options and people who never went to but i receive zero service for the theory off frequency off attendance – people that went to into the low-affirming spiritual configurations more often did not differ when you look at the amounts of internalized homophobia compared to those who went to shorter apparently ( Table dos ). In the efficiency perhaps not found, one another non-affirming affiliation, B = 0.01, t(349) = 0.fifteen, p = 0.89, and you will frequency out of attendance during the low-affirming setup, B = 0.03, t(177) = 0.43, p = 0.67, was indeed unrelated so you’re able to mind-admiration, appearing that habits of low-affirming spiritual exposures benim Еџirketim and you can internalized homophobia are certain to help you one’s experience out-of him- or by herself due to the fact a homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual person and never to help you around the world thinking-respect.

I hypothesized you to definitely Blacks and you can Latinos can get higher internalized homophobia than simply Whites because of deeper exposure to low-affirming faith ( Table step 3 ; visibility is placed each other because the association and you may regularity). We utilized Kenny, Kashy, and you may Bolger’s (1998) four-step processes to check for proof of mediation. Step one of mediation test is to try to see if this new publicity of great interest possess a life threatening relationship for the consequence of appeal, maybe not controlling to your mediator. Investigation reported into the Dining table dos signifies that both Blacks and Latinos had highest internalized homophobia than simply Whites but the differences is actually statistically significant getting Latinos simply, therefore the try out-of mediation manage affect Latinos only. I however included analysis to have Blacks within the then designs observe in case your information from connection had been in keeping with all of our hypothesis. Regarding second step, we revealed that, weighed against Whites, Blacks and you will Latinos enjoys deeper contact with low-affirming religion (both affiliation and you may volume of attendance; Dining table step three , patterns step one and you can 3). On the third step i showed that each other potential mediators anticipate internalized homophobia, dealing with getting competition/cultural group ( Table step 3 , activities 2 and 4). Regarding the latest step i calculated the fresh new the total amount that affiliation and you may regularity exposures mediated the connection ranging from race/ethnic classification and you will internalized homophobia by the examining the change in the fresh race/ethnic group coefficients when for every single hypothesized mediator was added to the fresh regression model. The outcomes mean mediation of the one another religious exposures of the relationship between Latinos and you will internalized homophobia ( Dining table 3 , models dos and you will cuatro). The latest regression coefficients on Latino adjustable diminished off men and women advertised within the Desk dos by the 20% and thirteen%, correspondingly, whenever we additional the fresh affiliation and frequency exposures into the formula. While doing so, introduction of the mediators about design made the essential difference between Latinos and you may Whites on internalized homophobia non-tall. Off note, the alterations in the coefficients was better to own Blacks than Latinos, changing because of the 50% and you can twenty-five%, correspondingly ( Dining table step 3 , designs dos and you will cuatro). Therefore, although the difference between internalized homophobia between Blacks and Whites is actually maybe not statistically high, Blacks did keeps large quantities of internalized homophobia than just Whites and you can it differences try decreased when the hypothesized mediators were used in the fresh patterns.

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben