UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

23.06.2022
CasualDates review

Hegel uses “The newest flower is actually purple” showing your world try sooner or later contradictory

von Team

Considering a summary of my personal dispute – and this actually at 71,100000 terminology stands for less than ten% of your point I have up until now blogged – the guy thinks he’s got know might work. Got the guy bothered to check (and end one to sniggering at the back; I am certain someday he will) however have seen which i offer out of blogged work, many moments, proper over the DM-range. Indeed, We manage to demonstrate that every dialectician indulges from the exact same variety of an effective priori dogmatics – in private laptops and authored performs – because Lenin, Engels and you may Hegel. Actually, that is the best way capable get this loopy ‘theory’ appear to works.

To be certain, discover a few boffins exactly who take on so it in addition to almost every other a couple ‘Laws’ as the rules – for example people who hail away from earlier years of the Communist Group (age.grams., Bernal, Haldane and you may Levy, etc.), but it’s a little clear these particular comrades could have managed that have contempt an effective PhD thesis one relied on facts just like the weakened because the one to included in this place away from dialectics. Indeed, their greet of your adequacy of your ‘data’ in support of DM can be a bit analogous so you’re able to an identical desired because of the boffins (that happen to be together with Creationists) away from ‘evidence’ in preference of, state, the latest medical accuracy of Book of Genesis.

As a whole, yet not, the fresh instances always supplied by dialecticians (such as for example Hegel, Lenin and you will Engels) to help you instruct their ‘Laws’ are almost instead of exemption possibly anecdotal or impressionistic. If someone were to fill in a newsprint in order to a technology log purporting to determine the newest veracity of an alternative legislation to the same amount of vagueness, imprecision, triteness, not enough outline and overall theoretic naivety, it could be declined in the earliest phase. Actually, dialecticians would themselves lose which have derision one try to present, say, possibly the scenario from traditional monetary principle and/or falsity regarding Marx’s very own run a keen evidential display which was as the crassly amateurish as this -, to express nothing of your derision they might let you know to own including theoretical wooliness. In such points, individuals who could be short in order to scream “pedantry” in https://datingranking.net/casualdates-review/ the circumstances raised in this article perform be loyal pedants, and you can nit get a hold of towards the best.

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben