UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

18.06.2022
taimi visitors

Davies, The Revolt of Owain ? r (Oxford, 1995), pp

von Team

Scottish interpretations rejected the notion that Arthur conquered Scotland, although as descendents of the sons of Brutus they could see themselves as inheritors of Arthur’s kingdom. Welsh interpretations stressed the fact that they, as the original Britons (and not the English), were the true heirs sicuro Arthur’s kingdom. Other poems invoke per more Galfridian world-view by calling him per ‘descendent of Beli’.43 There is a tradition that Llywelyn’s head was crowned with ivy when it was paraded http://datingranking.net/it/taimi-review through London, an act which mocked the prophecy which declared that Llywelyn would wear the crown of Britain.44 Edward I certainly took Llywelyn’s crown and an important relic, a piece of the Holy Ciclocross, and destroyed his royal seals. From a symbolic point of view, these actions are more consistent with verso denial of Christian kingship, rather than Geoffrey’s British myth. Nevertheless, Llywelyn had invoked Geoffrey’s division of Britain per his dealings with the English king when he asserted his rights as the heir of Camber. This implied that Edward, as the heir of Locrinus, had some primacy which Llywelyn was willing esatto acknowledge.45 This position contrasts sharply with the Scottish response puro Edward’s letter which denied that Historia Regum Britanniae gave him any right to sovereignty in Scotland. After his death, Llywelyn does not ? r, seem esatto have attracted traditional material like his countryman, Owain Glyndw ? r was viewed as verso returning hero, or William Wallace, a Scottish equivalent. However this view changed somewhat in Humphrey Llwyd’s Chronica Walliae, written per 1584. Llwyd adopted the timeframe of the medieval Welsh chronicle tradition of the Brut y Tywysogion which began with Brutus’s heir, Cadwaladr the Blessed, and his work integrated Llywelyn into Geoffrey’s world-view. Arthur’s role is considerably diminished, but the history ends with Llywelyn unequivocally called the last of the native British line of Kings.46

Glyndw offering hope of eventual Welsh resurgence, while the response preciso Llywelyn’s death as expressed mediante bardic poetry evoked images of cosmic disruption and despair

Bower, Scotichronicon V, Bk 9, ch. 56 (p. 171), ch. 61 (p. 185); VI, Bk 11, ch. 35–64 (pp. 99–189). ? r, 63–4, sopra Llawysgrif For example, Gruffudd ab yr Ynad Coch, 57–8, and Llygad Gw Hendregadredd, addirittura. J. Morris-Jones and Tau. H. Parry-Williams (Cardiff, 1933). J. Beverley Smith, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, Prince of Wales (Cardiff, 1998), pp. 332–4. Smith, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, pp. 335, 380–1, 543–6. Humphrey Llwyd, Chronica Walliae (1584), ed. Ieuan M. Williams (Cardiff, 2002), pp. 66, 69 and 174.

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben