UNi Logo
UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo UNi Logo

Über diesen Blog.

Hier schreiben Wissenschaftler*innen der Universität Oldenburg und Gastautor*innen darüber, wie sich Gesellschaften selbst wahrnehmen und thematisieren, sich ihrer jeweiligen Gegenwart vergewissern und dabei in die Zukunft entwerfen.

Wie stehen diese Selbstwahrnehmungen und -entwürfe mit Institutionen, Medien und Techniken zur Gestaltung von Natur, Gesellschaft und Subjektivität in Verbindung? Wie modellieren sie den lebensweltlichen Alltag und halten Menschen zu einem bestimmten Verhalten an? Wie werden diese Interventionen in das Gegebene begründet und legitimiert, aber auch kritisiert, verworfen oder unterlaufen?

Diesen Fragen, deren interdisziplinäre Reflexion eines der zentralen Anliegen des Wissenschaftlichen Zentrums „Genealogie der Gegenwart“ ist, gehen die Blogger aus unterschiedlichen Fachperspektiven und Tätigkeitszusammenhängen mit Blick auf kontrovers verhandelte Themen wie Migration, Ungleichheit, Digitalisierung, Kriminalität, Gesundheit und Ökologie nach.

02.07.2022
connection singles visitors

A concept is sometimes not “special and you may permanent” otherwise “complete” where changes originate from testing

von Team

Off Anonymous’s relationship to Wikipedia: “Fundamentally, conception is “the complete overall performance of one’s intellectual a portion of the creative act”, and you may “the new creation regarding the brain of your inventor out-of one and you may permanent idea of the complete https://datingranking.net/cs/connecting-singles-recenze/ and operative advancement because it are afterwards is applied used..”. “

3) Finalizing an agreement actually adequate – when someone forces you to get partnered at the gunpoint, the wedding cannot matter as it are coerced.

You can’t patent facts zero, nevertheless the person that gets to feel a creator is the person that gets the brand-new suggestion, maybe not the one who went the new studies. Until Dr. Charest possess written and you will old proof of his intellectual benefits to help you your panels, it would be hard to move ahead with this situation. I do not thought Andy Myers is an everyday PI (he’s not) and i do not think however have difficulties having a team off most other PIs future toward testify that he is in reality effective at powering a group that proportions. It’s he told you she told you at that time and you may they have ideal people to speak having him.

When i told you, persuading a jury that a teacher could possibly perhaps not design tests having twenty students, and you will run a research classification, demand, and construction and you can work with people may possibly not be in check inside genuine go out would not be hard (or unrealistic)

No, that isn’t true – except if the idea have been same as this new execution, the person who implements it’s very an inventor (because they added has actually in order to they to make it really works – the difference between an invention and you may a thought ‘s the function to get results). Lab laptops were there to document one to techniques – if they failed to focus on you to, you would shape that everyone (or at least Harvard) could well be doing things else in order to file. Files movements arguments out-of “he told you, he said” so you can “is it possible you read?”. At that time, it will be doing Myers to show files he developed the theory and its direct latest implementation.

For many who might discover one teacher just who you’ll reveal that the guy defines all of his subordinates’ experiments on a regular basis, that might be a start. I would personally perhaps not doubt one look professor’s capacity to manage good category (well, possibly one prof in the Texas Technical whose cowboy graduate scholar blew themselves up), however, I might doubt the overall performance in order to specify in advance just what their youngsters will do, to the set of explanations over.

I believe certain commenters listed here are unaware that laws recommends that is as indexed while the a founder on an excellent patent in america. Per claim from an effective patent is actually an alternative development and every inventor on the patent software must have produced a keen inventorship contribution to at least one claim detailed therein. Nobody who has got generated eg contributions are overlooked and no individual who has not yet generated particularly efforts is going to be provided. Actually, an inappropriate listing of creators can be invalidate a beneficial patent.

Diskussion einblenden/ausblenden

Bis jetzt noch keine Kommentare.

Einen Kommentar abgeben